32
Government & treaty records
Congressional hearings, agency research plans, declassified studies, and binding international instruments from the U.S., Canada, and the EU.
Source Library
How to use this library
32
Congressional hearings, agency research plans, declassified studies, and binding international instruments from the U.S., Canada, and the EU.
22
Published research on stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud seeding, engineered ice-nucleating particles, and human health effects.
10
Institutional assessments and policy analysis, including work that argues for geo-engineering and work that argues against it.
12
Mainstream reporting on federal funding, field experiments, and the programs that were launched or halted.
What this literature assesses
Filter by category or search across every title, agency, journal, and year. Links open the original document in a new tab.
76 sources, updated as new records are published
Hearings, agency research plans, statutes, and federal science programs addressing weather modification and solar radiation modification.
Mid-century federal weather-modification and stratospheric-deposition studies, including work sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission.
Canadian federal strategy documents, the bilateral weather-modification information agreement, and Canadian academic work on climate engineering.
European Commission advice, EU research programs, UN treaty instruments, and international assessment reports.
Published research on stratospheric aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening, engineered ice-nucleating particles, aerosol chemistry, and the occupational and public-health effects of atmospheric release.
Institutional assessments, policy briefs, and governance analysis from research institutes, universities, and advocacy organizations.
Mainstream reporting on federal geo-engineering funding, field experiments, and the programs that were launched or halted.
Editorial standard
This library includes documents that reach opposite conclusions. Federal research plans that treat solar radiation modification as a legitimate option sit alongside assessments arguing for an outright moratorium. Both belong here.
Listing a source is not an endorsement of its conclusions, and it is not a claim by the Coalition that any particular program is operating in any particular place. Where a document was published outside the major peer-reviewed journals, or where it is a working draft rather than a final paper, the entry says so.
Our own findings are published separately, with methodology and accredited laboratory results attached. If you spot a broken link, a superseded document, or a citation we've gotten wrong, please tell us and we'll correct it.
Go deeper
We run plain-language briefings that walk councils, schools, and residents through what these documents do and do not say.